The combined sensitivity and positional accuracy of the FIRST catalog
are unprecedented compared with any previous wide-area radio catalog.
(The NVSS [[Condon et al. 1994]] catalog has a sensitivity times
lower and a resolution
that of FIRST.) As such, our source
locations have an accuracy that match or exceed those of all currently
available large astronomical catalogs. As an illustration of the
utility of the FIRST catalog, we describe here comparisons we have
undertaken with three of the largest existing catalogs at other
wavelengths: the Guide Star Catalog ([Lasker et al. 1990]), the IRAS Faint
Source Catalog ([Moshir et al. 1992]), and the ROSAT WGACAT of X-ray sources
([White, Giommi & Angelini 1994]).
The Guide Star Catalog (GSC), produced by the Space Telescope Science Institute from scans of the ``Quick-V'' Palomar plates taken between 1982 and 1984, contains 18 million optical objects brighter than magnitude 16. The astrometric accuracy of the catalog is roughly 1", although the centers of large galaxies are uncertain by a larger amount. All objects are classified as either stellar or nonstellar although, as we discuss below, the former category contains a significant number of galaxies.
We performed separate matches between the 30,861 objects classified as
nonstellar and the 407,473 stellar objects which are found within the
boundaries of our survey region. A total of 475 nonstellar objects are
coincident with FIRST radio sources within 1", where is
expected by chance. A number of matches in excess of the false rate is
seen out to 10", although the false rate becomes
outside
of 5". These matches represent a mix of normal, nearby galaxies,
starburst galaxies and relatively low-redshift AGN. This complete,
flux-limited list of radio sources associated with galaxies in the
local Universe is a useful sample in which to identify such objects.
Note that we have simply matched the individual radio source positions
to each GSC entry; no effort has yet been made to match the
counterparts of classical double radio sources by searching between the
radio lobes where the parent galaxy is to be expected. We pursue this
issue in some detail in an upcoming publication ([McMahon et al. 1996]).
The match results for stellar objects yielded a surprising number of
coincidences given the rarity of luminous stellar radio sources:
98 (182) ``stars'' are found to be coincident with FIRST radio sources
within 1" (3"), with an expected false rate of only
(40) objects. Closer examination of the matches demonstrates
that most of these objects are misclassified galaxies. A search of the
NED and SIMBAD database revealed that 100 (55%) of the 182 ``stellar''
matches are, in fact, cataloged galaxies. Another 60 (33%) objects
have not been identified previously, although the radio and optical
properties of these objects are not statistically different from those
of the galaxies in this sample. At most 12 of these objects are
certifiably stars, 9 found in the SIMBAD database and 3 observed by us
as part of a spectroscopic follow-up of bright optical counterparts to
FIRST sources ([Gregg et al. 1996]), although even the 7 stellar candidates
within 1" are not significantly greater than the total false
rate expected for the GSC of
. While proper motions complicate
the identification of FIRST radio stars, and some of the GSC sources
which remain unidentified could be stellar radio sources, our basic
results confirm the expected rarity of stars at flux densities above
1 mJy at 20 cm. A further discussion of the handful of true stellar
radio sources discovered in our survey may be found in
[Becker et al. 1996].
The IRAS Faint Source Catalog (FSC - [Moshir et al. 1992]) includes over
173,000 objects in the high latitude sky observed at 12, 25, 60, and
100 m as part of the IRAS Sky Survey in 1983. The sources
represent a mix of stars and galaxies which are present in a ratio of
1:2 averaged over our range of Galactic latitudes. We have adopted the
definition of [Meurs & Harmon 1988] in using the far infrared colors to
identify the probable galaxies; given the results of the previous
section we do not expect a significant match rate with the stars. The
FSC source position uncertainties are described by error ellipses with
a mean major axis of 23"; these are putative
errors,
although we find a significant number of real matches out to four times
these values and beyond.
Of the IRAS sources within the FIRST survey area, 1814 have
radio counterparts within the
error ellipse, with only 65
expected by chance. All but 11 (0.6%) of these sources have galaxy
colors, confirming the nature of the identifications. An additional
matches in excess of the number expected by chance are found
between 2 and 4 times the
IRAS FSC error ellipse, although
the false rate rises to 36%.
It is not surprising that 45% of all IRAS sources with galaxian far
infrared colors appear in the FIRST survey. [Helou, Soifer & Rowan-Robinson 1985] have shown
that a tight correlation exists between the fluxes of radio and far
infrared emission in normal and starbursting galaxies. Given our peak
flux density threshold of 1 mJy/beam and the median flux density ratio of
for a radio
flux-limited sample ([Hacking et al. 1989]), we would expect to detect
(
) of galaxies with 60
m flux densities above
thresholds of
mJy (
mJy). We fail
to include many of these nearby, extended objects in our catalog
because their radio surface brightnesses fall below our detection limit
of 1 mJy/beam (including 0.25 mJy/beam CLEAN bias). We also suffer some
secondary loss in sensitivity both as a consequence of resolving out
the diffuse flux and as a result of the CLEAN bias (discussed above),
which is more severe for extended sources. As we show in
[BWH95], however, a large fraction of faint extended sources
with peak flux densities below our threshold are present in our
images at
significance, implying that direct queries of the
image database will allow us to detect a much larger fraction of FSC
sources. Further exploration of the IRAS source component of the FIRST
survey is left to a subsequent publication.
The Position Sensitive Proportional Counter (PSPC) on ROSAT conducted
nearly 5000 pointings covering each in the 0.1-2.4 keV
X-ray band during its four-year lifetime. The High Energy Science
Archive Research Center (HEASARC) has produced a catalog of 68,907
sources derived from these images (the WGACAT; [White, Giommi & Angelini 1994]). The
sources include a wide mix of astronomical objects in which coronally
emitting stars and AGN dominate. Positional uncertainties are quoted as
being 13" (
) if the source was observed within the
central 18' of the field and 50" if it fell outside this
region. A total of 188 (164, 56) PSPC pointings with exposure times
exceeding 500 s (2000 s, 10,000 s), covering a total of 520
,
fall within the FIRST survey region.
Of the 2212 sources with the more accurate positions which fall within
our radio coverage area, 311 are coincident to within 2 times the
quoted X-ray uncertainty (nominally, 95% confidence error circles)
with one or more radio sources; only 31 matches are expected by
chance. Thirty-eight of these are double radio sources with
separations of ", while an additional 5 are radio
triples (only
double or triple radio matches are expected by
chance). The 3312 sources with larger X-ray positional uncertainties
provide an additional
real matches, meaning that 17% of the
ROSAT sources in our survey area have FIRST radio counterparts. This
sample represents one of the largest lists of radio/X-ray coincidences
available to date (cf. [Brinkmann et al. 1995] and [Moran et al. 1996]), and
extends the exploration of X-ray-selected radio sources a factor of 30
fainter in radio flux density than previous large-area surveys. In
addition, unlike comparisons with previous radio catalogs, the radio
data here provide a substantial improvement in positional accuracy,
greatly simplifying the task of X-ray source optical identification.
In addition to the deep, but limited, coverage of the X-ray sky offered by the WGACAT, there exists a uniform, complete survey of the soft X-ray sky produced in the ROSAT All-Sky Survey (RASS) completed over five years ago. The scientific utility of a match between the RASS and the FIRST survey catalog is manifest, but the absence of a public version of this catalog has prevented us from carrying out the match. Perhaps this situation will be rectified in the near future.